The election is over. The people have spoken and have decisively returned a coalition conservative government. Our first thoughts are as follows:
This is a win for investors across all age groups. In short Labor’s policy agenda was to make it more difficult for anyone to build long term wealth and financial independence across all assets classes both inside and outside superannuation. The tax grab was all encompassing across all assets via the halving of the 50% Capital Gains Tax discount and in property via negative gearing changes and in shares via proposed changes to franking credits.
It is a win for the SMSF industry and those Australian’s typified by you, our clients who want control over their financial future and seek to build long term wealth within a stable policy framework. The policy to remove franking credit refunds for retirees and reintroduce in effect double taxation on dividends was poorly conceived. It was policy on the run as evidenced by the almost immediate change to exclude those on the aged pension. Labor grossly underestimated the fear, frustration, and impact of breaking yet again the social contract of not changing the rules for fully and partly self-funded retirees. More sinister was the underlying agenda of concentrating more power in the hands of Industry Super Funds by reducing the attractiveness of running an SMSF.
The nation has rejected the high tax and big government agenda. This along with the coalition tax cuts should deliver stronger economic growth and higher living standards for all Australians.
The election result is a win for policy stability particularly within the superannuation and retirement space at least for three years and hopefully much longer. A very clear message has been sent to both parties that ordinary Australians demand and deserve policy stability particularly in areas like retirement planning. Investing and wealth building as we so often advise is a long-term game.
Our role is to help you stay the course and wherever possible ignore the noise and focus on facts and fundamentals. Examples abound where people have changed their strategy based on what many saw as an inevitable Labor win. Our advice was always to wait for the result both in the House of Reps and the Senate. Even if Labor had won the lower house there was every possibility some of the polices proposed would never make it to and/or through the Senate.
Here’s to three years of policy stability!
Please contact us if you have any questions. Best wishes, Royston Capital.
Royston Capital Economic Update
August edition 2018, By Chris Boag
During the month of July, we saw most major share markets rise. The backdrop was one where there were strong company earnings reported, especially in the US, an easing of trade tensions, tempered by a slightly slowing rate of GDP growth. World GDP growth continues to be above trend, underpinned by an accelerating US economy. China’s growth has moderated, and European growth may also moderate. Australian GDP growth has accelerated and looks in good shape to continue the trend. As we discussed last month the increasing concerns of trade wars present a real and immediate threat to risk assets (equities). The ‘policy puts’ we have often relied on have however been marked down to a lower strike price meaning any correction could be deeper than expected.
In the US, the economy continues to expand and jump ahead of its peers. It’s the only major economy where leading indicators are still rising. There are some indications that US real GDP could top 4% in the second quarter, more than double most estimates of trend growth. This cannot be sustained. The unemployment rate stands at a multi-decade low of 3.75% with very little slack. This is great news, however, mainstream economic theory states that governments should tighten fiscal policy at this stage to temper the economy and build a war chest for the inevitable downturn. Trump is not an economist so of course he is adding fuel to economic fire with his tax cuts and big increases in Government spending. The economic outcomes are predictable; the labour market will overheat, and wages will accelerate. Workers will naturally spend their bounty increasing aggregate demand, probably beyond the economy’s productive capacity, inflation will rise. There are already signs of this scenario starting to play out.
The US Federal Reserve has an ideal inflation target of 2.2-2.3%. An increase above this would not necessarily worry the Fed however a sustained move above 2.5% would likely see a more aggressive policy response. The unemployment rate has now fallen 0.7% points below the Fed’s estimate of full employment which is great, but, history tells us that there has never been a case in post war era where the unemployment rate has risen by more than 1/3rd of a percentage point without a corresponding recession. The Fed will want to avoid a situation where the unemployment rate has fallen so far that it has nowhere to go but up. We note that Fed Chairperson J Powell has moved to hold press conferences every 6 weeks opening the door for more frequent rate hikes.
Here’s the rub, the US housing market is in great shape, and sensitive to interest rates but other sectors of the economy are not. It will take a pronounced increase in rates to generate enough distress in the corporate sector exacerbated by the low base from which we are starting. This will lead to a stronger US$ and will cool the economy by diverting some spending to imports. We think that the trajectory of interest rates is up and that the pace of rate hikes is at risk of accelerating.
During the mid-nineties I produced an economic paper on the Asian Currency Crisis. I won’t go into details except to say that there are some similarities with what is happening today. A large proportion of emerging market debt is in US$ (some say up to 80%). A vicious cycle could erupt where a stronger dollar makes it difficult for borrows to pay back their loans, lending to capital outflows from emerging markets and an even stronger US$. Emerging markets could raise interest rates to help prevent their currencies from plunging, however, this will make it difficult for local currency borrows to pay back their loans…….tricky position to be in.
Back in 2015 when emerging markets succumbed to pressure, China saved the day with a massive new stimulus. The Governments’ actions boosted all demand for industrial commodities. As we have noted in recent economic updates, the Chinese economy is slowing. So far, the policy response has been muted. I would have no doubt that China will stimulate their economy if the slow down looks like a hard landing. However, the bar for such stimulus is higher today than it was in 2015 due to elevated debt levels, excess capacity, pollution etc.
If you have been wondering why Xi Jinping has been quiet lately it’s because China’s politburo (the principal policy making committee of a communist party) and other senior leaders (most importantly the retired members of previous politburo) is having their annual summer camp in Beidaihe right now. This annual meeting could change courses of history – from leaders (including Mao himself twice) getting kick out of the government to smaller but significant changes to economic or social policies. Given the trade war is the most significant topic this year, it will be crucial to observe the immediate news-flow over the next 14 today to see if the meeting convinced Xi Jinping to change his stance.
In Europe, GDP growth is slowing but remains above long term trend. It now looks like the Euro area peaked last year. The weakening trend seems at least partly a function of slower growth in China and emerging markets. There is no immediate reason to believe growth will re-accelerate especially with Italy’s woes set to continue for some time. It is possible that the ECB could yet again extend the final deadline for the windup of the QE program.
In Australia GDP growth remains robust supporting the RBA’s view that GDP will average a touch above 3% for 2018 and 2019. We are also seeing stronger employment growth and further falls in the unemployment rate support by a peaking participation rate. Housing activity remains soft and there are continued concerns about high household debt in the absence of weak ages growth. We don’t see this scenario lasting for too much longer and expect inflation also to pick up. Inflation will be fuelled by rising international producer prices combined with a lower AUD$ to push up prices. A tighter labour market will eventually lead to an acceleration in wages growth. Food prices are likely to be impacted by the drought in QLD and NSW.
Our view is the RBA will have to tighten interest rates. Interestingly, economist Stephen Roberts is an outlier believing it could be as early as November this year. CBA are suggesting early 2019 and Westpac are suggesting sometime in 2020. I don’t care for these longer-term predictions, I think it’s better to say, ‘rates on hold for the foreseeable future’. Our view is that rates will go up, but we need to see more multiple economic readings (particularly wages growth) that justify a rate rise before the we think the RBA will make its move.
The current interest rate environment remains supportive of risk assets although clouds are gathering. Those accustomed to thinking that there is a ‘Fed Put’ waiting in the wings will be disappointed. The Fed wants slower growth and it may require weaker asset prices to achieve it. The ‘Fed Put’ is still there it’s just the strike price has moved lower. Likewise, growing financial and economic imbalances will limit the desire for China to further stimulate its economy so the ‘China stimulus put’ has also shifted lower. The same goes for the ‘ECB Put’. The ECB is hoping to wind down its asset purchase program (QE), meaning a key buyer of Italian debt is stepping back right when it is needed the most. The loss of these three policy-puts, along with rising trade protectionism, means the outlook for global outlook for risk assets is becoming more challenging.
This information was prepared by Royston Capital, ABN 98 158 028 392 AFSL 438262. The information in this presentation is current as at 6 July 2018 unless otherwise stated.
Material contained in this publication is an overview or summary only and it should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter or relied upon as such.
This publication is confidential and intended only for current clients and prospective clients of Royston Capital and their professional institutional advisors only and is not to be provided to other persons.
This publication does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities or any interests in investment funds advised by, or the advisory services of, Royston Capital. This publication contains general information only and does not consider your personal objectives, financial situation or needs and so you should consider its appropriateness having regard to these factors before acting on it.
No legal or tax advice is provided. Any taxation position described in this publication should be used as a guide only and is not tax advice. You should consult a registered tax agent for specific tax advice on your circumstances. Recipients should independently evaluate specific investments and trading strategies.
By accepting receipt of this publication, the recipient agrees not to distribute, offer or sell this presentation or copies of it and agrees not to make use of the publication other than for its own general information purposes.
The views expressed in this publication represent the opinions of the persons responsible for it as at its date and should not be construed as guarantees of performance with respect to any investment. Royston Capital has taken reasonable care to ensure that the information contained in this publication has been obtained from reliable sources, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of such information. Royston Capital does not undertake and is under no obligation to update or keep current the information or content contained in this publication for future events.
Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. In addition, the price and/or value of and income derived from any investment may vary because of changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, operational or financial conditions. Investors may therefore get back less than originally invested. Furthermore, these investments may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. Portfolio performance is based on a theoretical model portfolio, returns for individual investors may differ.
Royston Capital, nor its associates, does not accept any liability in negligence or otherwise for any loss or damage suffered by any party resulting from reliance on this publication.
© 2018 Royston Capital Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means, whether graphically, electronically, mechanically or otherwise howsoever, including without limitation photocopying and recording on magnetic tape, or included in any information store and/or retrieval system without prior written permission of Royston Capital Pty Ltd.
Sources: Admiral Investments, Alexander Funds Management (Steven Roberts); RBA, BCA Research.
The changes to the superannuation system passed as law in November included a drop in the Division 293 threshold. The article written for Self Managed Super magazine notes the strategic use of self-funding instalment warrants could offer some relief for SMSF members affected by this amendment.
Click for more: Tackling a lower tax threshold (456 downloads)
In 2013-14, Australian women aged 60-64 – merely years out from retirement – had on average just $138,150 in super savings.
And here’s the real kicker: Women also live longer than men. The average life expectancy for an Australian woman is currently at 84.3, while the average Aussie male is living to 79.9.
Click for more: Mind The Gap